p=0.03ġ/30 in SSD-CN group and 4/30 in SSD group. Patients were randomised to receive silver sulphadiazine (SSD) dressings or silver suphadiazine with cerium nitrate (SSD-CN).ġ7.2☘.3 in SSD-CN group vs. P4 months with burns areas >15% who had been admitted within 24h of the injury. Flammazine dressings were changed 12hrly, Biobrane dressings were left in place.ġ6.1☐.6 days for F group, 9.7☐.7 for B group. NSĢ0 paediatric patients with thermal flame or scald burns with the total burn surface area between 2 and 29%.ġ0 patients randomised to Biobrane dressing (bilaminated composite) and 10 patients to Flammazine. P=0.0036.ġ patient in Flammazine group, no patients in Mepitel group. Mepitel 8.11 days, Flammazine 11.67 days. The patients were randomised and 35 children received Flammazine dressings while 41 received Mepitel dressings (silicon coated nylon dressing with no biological compounds). 5 patients withdrawn from each group due to need for skin grafting. ![]() Relevant Paper(s) Author, date and countryĥ0 patients with superficial thermal burn treated over 16 months, 24h old excluded. ![]() Medline: AND LIMIT to English language and humansĬochrane:'silver sulphadiazine' or 'flamazine'Ĥ10 papers were found in Medline of which 12 were relevant. Medline using the OVID interface 1966 to September Week 3 2006.Ĭochrane Database.of Systematic Reviews Issue 2 2006 ![]() You wonder if silver sulphadiazine cream is better than normal dressings at reducing the risk of infection and healing time. In is at ? Clinical ScenarioĪ 25 year old science teacher comes into the emergency department with a partial thickness burn to her hand after being careless with a bunsen burner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |